Con el lanzamiento de la serie de televisión Harry Potter, la gente ya está haciendo comparaciones con las películas existentes y con J.K. Los libros de Rowling. Incluso el primer tráiler del programa de HBO, una nueva versión de Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal, ha provocado mucha discusión sobre cómo se compara con las versiones anteriores.
Una gran ventaja de volver a visitar el mundo mágico en la televisión es la oportunidad de refinar la forma en que se retratan ciertos personajes. Con tiempo y una nueva perspectiva, la serie podría incluso crear versiones de personajes queridos que sean incluso más convincentes que las de los libros originales.
Más allá de abordar otros problemas del universo de Harry Potter, la nueva serie de HBO tiene la oportunidad de mejorar personajes que no fueron bien retratados en las películas o que eran débiles en los libros originales. En algunos casos, reimaginar a estos personajes en la pantalla no es sólo una buena idea: es esencial.
Como fan, estoy muy entusiasmado con esta nueva serie de televisión porque tiene la oportunidad de darle a diez personajes mágicos las historias que se merecen. Por lo que he oído sobre la adaptación de Harry Potter de HBO hasta ahora, ya están trabajando para desarrollar esos personajes y brindarles viajes más satisfactorios.
10. Marrón lavanda
Las películas de Harry Potter no le hicieron justicia a Lavender Brown. No la establecieron como una amiga importante de Harry y sus compañeros de Gryffindor hasta la sexta película, El príncipe mestizo. E incluso entonces, su interpretación parecía una versión exagerada e inexacta del personaje de los libros.
En las películas, Lavender a menudo es retratada como una novia molesta que constantemente usa una voz infantil y el público se cansa rápidamente de ella. No ayuda que ella aparezca de repente sin mucha presentación. Afortunadamente, HBO lo ha reconocido y planea abordarlo en la serie dándole una introducción adecuada.
9. Florencia El Centauro
La nueva serie de televisión de Harry Potter tiene la oportunidad de darle al centauro Firenze un papel más importante. Estuvo en gran parte ausente de las películas posteriores después de una breve aparición en Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal. La serie puede explorar más a su personaje, especialmente porque se convierte en profesor de Adivinación durante el quinto año de Harry en Hogwarts.
Esta parte de la historia conduce a una peligrosa pelea entre Firenze y los otros centauros en el Bosque Prohibido, y él apenas sobrevive. La película Harry Potter y la Orden del Fénix omitió por completo esta trama porque no tuvieron suficiente tiempo.
8. Rita Skeeter
Rita Skeeter es una villana memorable de la serie Harry Potter que fácilmente podría robarse el espectáculo cada vez que aparece. Es decepcionante que no aparezca de manera más destacada en las películas. Solo aparece brevemente en Harry Potter y el cáliz de fuego, y su entrevista con Harry durante el Torneo de los Tres Magos no es tan divertida en la película como lo es en el libro.
El programa no explora lo suficiente la historia de Rita Skeeter, lo cual es una pena porque ella es una gran rival de Harry, Ron y Hermione, especialmente en los libros posteriores. Rita Skeeter es una de J.K. Las creaciones más divertidas de Rowling y merecen más tiempo en pantalla en la próxima serie.
7. Percy Weasley
Percy Weasley’s role was significantly reduced in the Harry Potter movies, though he does appear in The Order of the Phoenix. In the books, his change from a proud but likable student leader to a cold and calculating Ministry official is one of the most compelling and well-developed character arcs.
Although the films didn’t focus on this storyline, the HBO series can now delve into it properly. This development in Percy’s character is significant because it shows the Weasleys aren’t perfect, adding depth to a family that’s often portrayed as flawless in the books.
6. Professor Trelawney
Professor Trelawney’s initial prophecy in Harry Potter is a crucial moment that sets the entire story in motion and hints at how it will eventually end. Despite this important role, the movies didn’t fully explore her character, and she deserves more attention than she received.
Emma Thompson’s portrayal of Professor Trelawney was excellent, perfectly capturing her quirky and unusual personality, making her a standout character in the Harry Potter films. However, the movies didn’t feature her enough, and her departure from Hogwarts in The Order of the Phoenix felt rushed and unsatisfying.
5. Cho Chang
Cho Chang, more than any other character in J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series, deserves a fairer portrayal. Actress Katie Leung, who played Cho in the fourth and fifth films, experienced racist bullying related to her role, and this likely stemmed from the character’s name and how Rowling wrote her.
The names “Chang” and “Cho” might unintentionally evoke a derogatory slur used against people of East Asian descent, as “Chang” is a typical Chinese surname and “Cho” means “autumn” in Mandarin. Furthermore, the character Cho is portrayed negatively throughout the second half of The Order of the Phoenix.
Both the book and the movie strongly encourage viewers to sympathize with Harry over Cho. While it’s unlikely the show will drastically change her character, the HBO Harry Potter series has an opportunity to show Cho in a more favorable light, offering a fairer depiction of their breakup and her reaction to what she perceived as a betrayal by Dumbledore’s Army.
4. Remus Lupin
Remus Lupin is a key character in the Harry Potter series, but his role is significantly reduced in the films after he’s first introduced in The Prisoner of Azkaban. As a close friend of James Potter, Lupin becomes a sort of protector for Harry, particularly after Sirius Black’s death in The Order of the Phoenix.
The movies leave out most of Lupin’s story from the Harry Potter books, so viewers mainly know him as the werewolf who helped Harry, Ron, and Hermione meet Sirius Black in the third film. His character is actually very complex and ultimately heartbreaking, and the TV series needs to show all of those important details.
3. Ginny Weasley
I’ve always felt the movies didn’t quite do Ginny Weasley justice, even from her very first scene at Platform Nine and Three Quarters. In the books, it’s clear she had a crush on Harry right away, but the movies just didn’t show that initial spark – it felt like a big part of her character was missing from that first meeting.
The films also skip over Ginny’s growth into the strong and brave witch Harry falls for in The Half-Blood Prince. The on-screen development of their early romance feels flat and doesn’t make their connection very believable or engaging. It’s likely the HBO series, with Gracie Cochrane as Ginny, will portray their relationship more effectively.
2. Hermione Granger
It’s hard to fault either the movie or book version of Hermione Granger, as both are incredibly memorable. Emma Watson’s portrayal is a highlight of the Harry Potter films, and the character in the books often feels like a reflection of J.K. Rowling herself within the story.
The movies don’t fully capture Hermione’s character. They leave out important parts, like her genuine care for house-elves and some of her less appealing qualities that were toned down after the first film. Even in the books, Hermione could be a more well-rounded character by showing more of her weaknesses and struggles alongside her strengths and achievements.
The new HBO series has the potential to offer the most compelling portrayal of the character we’ve seen so far. Arabella Stanton, who will be playing the character previously known from Harry Potter, is a talented actor who could really bring depth and nuance to the role on television.
1. Lord Voldemort
So far, the biggest role yet to be filled for HBO’s Harry Potter series is Lord Voldemort. Paul Bettany has addressed speculation that he’s been cast as the character, confirming he hasn’t been contacted by the show’s team. It seems no actor has been approached for the part at this time.
The show absolutely needs to nail the casting for this role, alongside the visual effects used to bring the new version of Voldemort to life. While Ralph Fiennes did a good job, the character didn’t quite come across as menacing as he should have been.
Beyond how Voldemort looks on screen, the movie versions haven’t fully developed his character, leaving him less complex and believable than in the books. For HBO’s new Harry Potter series to be a success, it needs to deliver a more fully realized and compelling Lord Voldemort.
- Bourne se encuentra con Bond en el thriller de 10 capítulos de Paramount+ diseñado para ser disfrutado
- 13 películas que han recaudado mil millones de dólares en taquilla desde 2020, clasificadas
- USD CLP PRONOSTICO
- 8 próximas películas de zombis que llegarán a los cines en 2026
- Sicario se encuentra con Narcos en la serie de suspenso de 10 capítulos de Apple TV diseñada para ser disfrutado
- 10 mejores villanos de Superman que podrían ser héroes si quisieran
- ETH PRONOSTICO. ETH criptomoneda
- EUR CLP PRONOSTICO
- Killing Faith: Western sobrenatural aprobado por Stephen King ahora en VOD
- EUR AUD PRONOSTICO
2026-05-13 21:51