ebaster

Crypto Chaos desatado: ballet de Bitcoin, ETFS on Parade & ¡Drama de precio! 🚀💥

by

Bitcoin, como un héroe ruso melancólico que regresa del exilio, organizó un regreso resuelto después de deambular por debajo de $ 115,000, luego, con una sonrisa impecable, abovedada más allá de $ 116,000, alcanzando un máximo de $ 116,935. A mitad de camino, se deslizó a un malhumoroso $ 116,224, solo para recuperarse con un guiño desafiante, cruzando $ 117,000 y estableciéndose en el agradablemente presumido $ 117,235.

tag. The original title is “Solana’s Alpenglow upgrade could make it faster than Google: Here’s how.” To make it more clickbaity and in Pratchett’s style, maybe something like “Solana’s Alpenglow: When Blockchains Outrun Your Uncle’s Wi-Fi 🚀” with emojis. Next, the first section: “The boldest step yet” becomes something like “The Boldest Step Yet (or How Solana Learned to Juggle Mountains and Not Drop Any)”. I’ll need to inject humor, maybe comparing blockchain speeds to something absurd, like a mountain-climbing tortoise. For the part about transaction speeds, Pratchett might compare it to a dragon’s sneeze or somethingAnalyzing text structure and tone… . The paragraph about Google and Visa could be phrased as “If Solana can truly operate in that window, one might find oneself wondering if blockchain is just the internet’s clever cousin who’s read all the books and now thinks they’re a wizard.” In the “How Solana stacks up against rivals” section, I can use a comparison to Discworld characters or elements. Maybe mention Ethereum as a slow-moving wizard or something. The part about Sui could be “Sui, another blockchain, is like a well-meaning apprentice who’s still learning to tie their boots.” For the governance vote section, maybe add a metaphor about democracy in a fantasy setting. “Validators and stakers quickly cleared the 33% quorum requirement” could become “Validators and stakers, like a well-drilled regiment of dwarfs, swiftly met the quorum requirements.” The mechanics of Alpenglow: Votor and Rotor could be personified as characters. “Votor and Rotor are the new kids on the blockchain, and they’ve brought a bag of tricks that would make a conjurer weep with envy.” Risks and centralization: Pratchett often highlights the absurdity of bureaucracy or power structures. “Solana’s reliance on Agave is like building an entire city on the backAnalyzing the given text… of a very tired tortoise. Enter Firedancer, the knight in shining armor who’s late to the party but brings a very shiny sword.” In the “Why it matters beyond speed” section, using gaming and DeFi examples, maybe compare lag to something like a dragon’s breath or a troll blocking the path. “Blockchain-based games often stumble when interactions lag… Sub-second finality could make in-game economies feel as smooth as a well-polished disco floor.” For the infrastructure section, mention financial institutions with a touch of humor. “Three publicly listed companies have staked their reputations… like wizards betting their hats on a new spell.” Finally, the “What’s next” section: Use a metaphor about upcoming events. “A testnet deployment… is like planning a grand feast but making sure the pies are baked first.” I need to ensure that all images remain in place, no tags are used, and no colors are applied. Also, add emojis where appropriate without overdoing it. Check that the title is under 100 characters and not repeated in the body. Make sure the humor is present but not forced, and the sarcasm is subtle. Also, verify that all the key points from the original text are covered with the Pratchett style. Done in 12s. Solana’s Alpenglow: When Blockchains Outrun Your Uncle’s Wi-Fi 🚀 The Boldest Step Yet (or How Solana Learned to Juggle Mountains and Not Drop Any) Solana has always pitched itself as the blockchain for speed. With Alpenglow, it’s attempting a quantum leap-or perhaps a very brisk sprint while juggling pineapples. Validators have voted overwhelmingly in favor of the upgrade, with almost 99% support across the network. If successfully implemented, Alpenglow is expected to reduce transaction finality from roughly 12.8 seconds to just 100 to 150 milliseconds. That’s close to a hundred times faster than current speeds and well within the range of internet benchmarks most people take for granted. Imagine your morning coffee brewing in the time it takes a transaction to finalize. Revolutionary, or just a caffeine crisis averted? To put that into perspective, a Google search averages about 200 ms. Payment processors like Visa settle card transactions in a similar timeframe. If Solana can truly operate in that window, blockchain applications might feel indistinguishable from traditional systems. Or, as one wizard might say: “Is this magic or just the internet? I’ve been asking for decades.” The shift could redefine user expectations of crypto entirely. Or at least make them forget the last time they waited for a blockchain to confirm a payment. 🤯 How Solana Stacks Up Against Rivals (or Why Ethereum is Still Wearing Flip-Flops) Even before Alpenglow, Solana carved out a reputation as one of the fastest major blockchains. Like a cheetah in loafers. Its 12.8-second finality already outpaces Ethereum’s confirmation cycle, which typically takes 12 seconds for inclusion and around 12 minutes to reach true finality through its checkpointing mechanism. That’s like comparing a sprint to a group of wizards arguing over the correct number of candles for a spell. By comparison, Sui, a layer-1 built for performance, boasts around 400-ms finality, which is impressive but still more than double what Alpenglow targets. Sui is like a well-meaning apprentice who’s still learning to tie their boots. If Solana delivers on its promises, the gap could reshape the competitive landscape. For decentralized exchanges, derivatives platforms and blockchain-based games, sub-second finality becomes a prerequisite for real-time interaction. Or, as one developer put it: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.” Users who have grown accustomed to the lag of most Web3 systems could experience something far closer to the immediacy of Web2. Or at least something that doesn’t make them want to throw their devices into the nearest lake. 🛶 Did you know? In 2024, CoinGecko Research revealed that Solana garnered a whopping 38% of global crypto investor interest in chain-specific narratives, surpassing Ethereum’s 10%. That’s like Ethereum being the understudy and Solana stealing the spotlight during the third act. Inside the Governance Vote (or Democracy, But With Pineapples) The governance process for Alpenglow kicked off on Aug. 21, 2025, spanning epochs 840 through 842. Like a very organized tea party with a strict schedule. Participation was strong right from the outset. Validators and stakers quickly cleared the 33% quorum requirement, ensuring the proposal couldn’t stall out. Validators and stakers, like a well-drilled regiment of dwarfs, swiftly met the quorum requirements. As ballots rolled in, support proved overwhelming. Early tallies showed backing between 99.6% and 99.7%, with only a sliver of participants voting against. By the time the vote closed on Sept. 4, 2025, 98.94% of all participating stakeholders had approved the measure. Roughly 0.5% opposed, and another almost half-percent abstained. Crucially, participation hit around 52% of the network’s total stake, comfortably above the minimum threshold and strong enough to suggest broad legitimacy. Such near-unanimity is unusual in decentralized governance, where divisions often emerge even on technical upgrades. For Solana, the outcome shows alignment among stakeholders regarding Alpenglow’s necessity. Or, as one validator said: “We’re all on the same page. The page is titled ‘Let’s Make This Thing Go Faster.’” The Mechanics of Alpenglow (or How to Outrun a Dragon’s Sneeze) At Alpenglow’s core are two new architectural components: Votor and Rotor. These systems overhaul how Solana processes and finalizes transactions, allowing the chain to confirm blocks in 100-150 ms. Instead of waiting for multiple rounds of validator communication, the upgrade enables faster consensus without compromising security guarantees. Like a wizard who’s finally learned to stop casting spells mid-air. Alongside speed, Alpenglow introduces a new economic model. Validator Admission Tickets (VATs) aim to streamline validator onboarding while reducing operational costs. Paired with the “20 20” resilience model, where the network can tolerate up to 20% of validators failing and another 20% behaving maliciously, Solana gains robustness against disruptions. Or, as one engineer said: “We’re building a bridge that won’t collapse if a troll decides to dance on it.” Now, building decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, trading engines or multiplayer games will be possible without the awkward delays users often endure. Transactions could feel instant, which will likely unlock use cases that previously required centralized infrastructure. Or, as one developer whispered: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.” Risks Native to Solana (or Why You Shouldn’t Trust a Tortoise With a Backpack) Alpenglow’s promise is extraordinary, but the upgrade doesn’t erase every concern hanging over Solana. Like a dragon who’s forgotten to pack snacks for the journey. The network still depends almost entirely on Agave, its main validator client. A bug or exploit in that client could ripple across the entire ecosystem. However, relief is coming in the form of Firedancer, a second validator client built by Jump Crypto. Expected to debut on the mainnet later this year, Firedancer could diversify the network’s software base and drastically improve resilience. Having multiple independent clients is standard in other ecosystems (Ethereum runs on Geth, Nethermind, Besu and Erigon), so Solana’s reliance on just one remains a red flag until Firedancer is fully operational. Or, as one developer put it: “We’re like a kingdom with only one blacksmith. If he takes a holiday, we’re all wearing sandals.” There are also questions about centralization. While VATs and cost reductions aim to lower entry barriers, some critics argue that fixed-tier fees and fault-tolerance thresholds could favor larger validators with deeper resources. If that dynamic plays out, the network risks trading one bottleneck (speed) for another (concentration of power). Or, as one skeptic said: “We’ve replaced a slow tortoise with a slightly faster tortoise. The race is still a metaphor for something else.” Did you know? Researchers recently uncovered specialized phishing techniques targeting Solana (coined “SolPhish”) that have led to $1.1 million in losses. Ahead of this, they developed SolPhishHunter, a pioneering detection tool for the ecosystem. Like a wizard who finally learned to spot the “Your Account Has Been Compromised” emails from 1997. Why It Matters Beyond Speed (or How to Make a DEX Feel Like a Coffee Shop) The headline number (150 ms) grabs attention, but the real story is what that speed enables. Like a wizard who finally learned to stop casting spells mid-air. Consider a decentralized exchange (DEX). Today, even the best DeFi platforms can’t match the responsiveness of centralized order books. It is not unusual to see market conditions shifting considerably by the time a transaction clears. With Alpenglow, order books could update in real time, giving traders the same fluid experience they expect from centralized platforms – without sacrificing custody. Or, as one trader said: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.” The benefits are even more obvious with gaming. Blockchain-based games often stumble when interactions lag or require long confirmation windows. Sub-second finality could make in-game economies feel flawless, whether that’s trading items, earning rewards or settling bets. Like a game where the dragon doesn’t take a 10-minute nap before breathing fire. Moreover, for payments, Alpenglow could be a breakthrough. Sending stablecoins across borders in 150 ms would put crypto payments on par with credit card networks. Combined with Solana’s low fees, the upgrade positions the network as a genuine alternative for real-time settlement. Or, as one merchant said: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.” Infrastructure for Enterprise-Grade Finance (or Why Dragons Are Investing in Tokenized Pineapples) Sub-second finality paired with stronger resilience mechanisms creates a blockchain that appeals greatly to businesses that can’t afford downtime. Like a wizard who’s finally learned to stop casting spells mid-air. The same goes for the 20 20 resilience model, reassuring players who worry about network stability. The numbers already point to growing institutional trust. Three publicly listed companies have collectively staked around $1.7 billion on Solana, which demonstrates confidence in its long-term stability. Beyond staking, the ecosystem is broadening. Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) on Solana now total roughly $390 million, while total value locked (TVL) has climbed past $8.6 billion. Staking yields averaging about 7% are also fueling demand for new investment products, with exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to Solana (SOL) recording millions in inflows. Solana is moving well beyond retail adoption and speculation, positioning itself as infrastructure capable of supporting enterprise-level finance. Or, as one investor said: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.” Did you know? Major financial entities, including HSBC, Bank of America, Euroclear and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, are integrating Solana into their tokenization efforts via a strategic partnership with R3. Like a kingdom finally realizing that dragons make excellent bankers. What’s Next for Solana? (or How to Bake a Blockchain Without Burning the Kitchen) With governance finalized, Solana’s roadmap is firmly in motion. Like a wizard who’s finally learned to stop casting spells mid-air. A testnet deployment of Alpenglow is scheduled for December 2025 at the Breakpoint conference, followed by a mainnet upgrade in Q1 2026. In parallel, Firedancer is progressing through a phased rollout. Already operating in a hybrid “Frankendancer” mode on more than 10% of validators as of mid-2025 (and demonstrating throughput above 1 million transactions per second in testing), it represents a decisive step toward client diversity. For Solana, the stakes are high as it aims for sub-100 ms finality while also ensuring resilience against single-client risk. If successful, the combination of Alpenglow and Firedancer will both lock in Solana’s performance edge for high-throughput applications. Together, these updates will provide a more inclusive foundation for smaller validators and developers, strengthening the ecosystem’s long-term credibility. Or, as one developer said: “Finally, a blockchain that doesn’t make me feel like I’m using a typewriter from 1912.”

by

2025-09-17 20:36

El spin-off cancelado de Arrow podría haber presentado el Black Canary de Smallville

by

En enero de 2020, el CW emitió un episodio de Arrow llamado “Green Arrow & The Canaries” que también fue una prueba para una nueva serie potencial. Este spin-off se habría establecido en 2040 y presentó a la hija de Oliver Queen, Mia Smoak (interpretada por Katherine McNamara) como la nueva Arrow Verde, junto a Katie Cassidy y Juliana Harkavy repitiendo sus roles como diferentes versiones de Black Canary. Sin embargo, el CW decidió no avanzar con la serie un año después, y la pandemia Covid-19 jugó un papel en esa decisión.

El spin-off cancelado de Arrow podría haber presentado el Black Canary de Smallville

by

En enero de 2020, el CW emitió un episodio de * Arrow * llamado “Green Arrow & The Canaries” que también fue una prueba para una nueva serie potencial. Este spin-off se habría establecido en 2040 y presentó a la hija de Oliver Queen, Mia Smoak (interpretada por Katherine McNamara), junto con Laurel Lance (Katie Cassidy) y Dinah Drake (Juliana Harkavy) como el canario negro. Sin embargo, la red decidió no avanzar con la serie un año después, y la pandemia Covid-19 jugó un papel en esa decisión.

Revisión de “una batalla después de otro”: el thriller incendiario de la PTA

by

Tengo mucha curiosidad por saber qué argumentos usó para llevar a la gente a bordo con este proyecto. Tener a Leonardo DiCaprio definitivamente ayudó: es una gran estrella y un atractivo confiable para el público. Sin embargo, su papel en * una batalla tras otra * es una gran desviación de su imagen habitual. Juega a un ex revolucionario, luchando con la depresión, el alcohol y otros problemas, y pasa la mayor parte de la película luciendo desaliñada y, a diferencia de su yo típicamente guapo. Este no es el glamoroso Leo que vimos en *Titanic *; Es un tipo de papel muy diferente y una película muy diferente.